Janet Elizabeth Thomas Janet Elizabeth Thomas

Learning to look: Between a cry and a proclamation

What does it mean to really look at art? Not to glance, not to label, not to decide quickly whether you like it—but to stay with it long enough for something to shift. This question becomes especially vivid when two works are placed side by side, not to confirm each other, but to challenge the way we see.

Consider the encounter between Anakronos, the monumental granite relief by Nicholas Georgouras, and Out of the depths I cry to you, the large oil painting by Janet Elizabeth Thomas. At first glance, they seem to belong to entirely different worlds. One is carved, structured, declarative; the other is painterly, fluid, and inward. But it is precisely this difference that activates the act of looking.

Thomas’s painting draws you in quietly. A solitary figure hovers in a deep, enveloping blue, suspended between falling and rising. The body is soft, vulnerable, its gesture ambiguous—part surrender, part resistance. There is no fixed ground, no clear orientation. Instead, there is atmosphere, sensation, a sense of being submerged within one’s own interior world. The title reads like a whisper or a plea, reinforcing the feeling that this is not an image to be decoded, but an experience to be entered.

If you spend time with it, the painting begins to unfold slowly. The brushwork, the tonal shifts, the subtle presence of organic forms—these are not just aesthetic details, but carriers of feeling. You start to realise that the work is less about what is shown than about how it is felt. It resists clarity, and in doing so, it invites you to sit with uncertainty.

Nicholas Georgouras Granite Relief "Anakronos" with J.E. Thomas' Psalm series painting "Out of the depths I cry to you"

Then you turn to Anakronos.

Where Thomas’s work dissolves, Georgouras’s asserts. The central figure stands upright, frontal, commanding. Around it, a network of symbols, inscriptions, and figures unfolds across the surface with deliberate precision. The material—granite—anchors the work in permanence. Lines are incised, controlled, resistant to change. The limited palette of black, white, and red carries the weight of ritual and history, suggesting a language that is constructed rather than felt.

This is not a work that invites you inward in the same way. It confronts you. It asks to be read, interpreted, even decoded. There is a sense of system here—of meaning being built, structured, and presented. If Thomas’s painting is a cry emerging from within, Anakronos is a proclamation projected outward into the world.

Placed together, these works do something powerful. They sharpen each other. The vulnerability of Thomas’s figure becomes more pronounced in the presence of Georgouras’s authority. At the same time, the certainty of Anakronos begins to feel less absolute when seen alongside the ambiguity of the painting. What seemed fixed starts to open; what seemed fluid gains intensity.

This is where the real value of looking emerges. Not in isolating works, but in allowing them to enter into dialogue. The space between them becomes active—a site of tension, contrast, and discovery. You begin to move back and forth, not just physically, but mentally, testing your own responses against what you see.

And something else happens, something more subtle. You become aware of your own position as a viewer. Do you gravitate toward the emotional openness of the painting, or the structured authority of the relief? Do you trust what you feel, or what you can analyse? These are not questions with right answers, but they matter. They reveal how you engage with the world beyond the gallery as well.

In this sense, looking at art is not passive. It is a form of participation. The works do not complete themselves without you. Meaning is not fixed within them; it emerges through your attention, your movement, your willingness to stay with what is not immediately clear.

This is why juxtaposition matters. It disrupts the comfort of quick interpretation and replaces it with a more demanding, but more rewarding, kind of seeing. It asks you to hold two different realities at once—to recognise that art can be both an intimate expression of inner life and a constructed system of external meaning.

If you take anything from this encounter, let it be this: give yourself time. Stand in front of a work longer than feels necessary. Then look at another. Let them speak to each other, and to you. Because in that space—between a cry and a proclamation—you may begin to see not just the artworks more clearly, but your own way of seeing itself.


Read More